Comments on: No. 2 Jayhawks dress for success, hold off upset-minded Mountaineers

By: Rob Dauster

Rob Dauster — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:44:20 +0000

Beelza, there’s not a single person here who is saying that Kansas played well last night. You do realize that, right? Your first comment took issue with a “looking sharp” comment that was made in the link on the front page of NBCSports.com that led to this post. The “looking sharp” comment was referring to the new jerseys that Kansas was wearing. As in, you know, those jerseys look good. They are pretty snazzy. They “look sharp”.

So, essentially, you’re over here flipping out about something where no one is disagreeing with you because you can’t comprehend what was written in a link leading to this post that none of the writers for CBT had any control over.

I’m not flagging anybody for anything. You’re more than welcome to spew your nonsense here all you want. It’s hilarious. In fact, I just liked your last comment.

By: Eric Angevine

Eric Angevine — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:19:38 +0000

So, beelza, it sounds like you may not be familiar with Bob Huggins. He’s one of the top defensive coaches in the business, so that might account for a few of those turnovers. But I will grant you the free throw problems. Obviously something you want to work on if you’re Bill Self.

By: beelza

beelza — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:37:45 +0000

I’ll give ya a little help robbie. No. 2 team went 18 for 34 Free Throw line. KU turned the ball over 17 times. They start what 4 or 5 seniors. That’s a botched abortion stat line homeboy. It gets worse, WV is unranked, but they went 80% 12/15 from the Free Throw line and had only 9 turnovers. That KU FG% of 54, was padded by several fast breaks, and many, many points in the paint. Your cheap sarcasm, reveals your lips all over Jim Rome’s phallus. If you can’t bring your own creative material, then don’t bring any. Now flag me and go run to the mods.

By: Rob Dauster

Rob Dauster — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:15:04 +0000

I have no idea what this comment is referring to, but I’d imagine that whatever “looking sharp” quote you’re upset about, it had to do with their jerseys, not their play.

Although, those jerseys are hideous. So yes, the opinion that Kansas, in anyway, looked sharp last night is “flatly wrong”, but it still doesn’t chance the fact that your comment is equally untrue.

It’s too bad you don’t have the “NBC Sports brand” backing you.

By: beelza

beelza — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:12:30 +0000

I respect th NBC Sports brand, it is a global and Iconic brand built by decades of hard work. To say that the Kansas Jay Hawks looked sharp in the win over WV is flatly wrong, unless one didn’t watch the entire game. The article’s author and this post’s author share one fact, we present our own POVs. Not going to spew box score or interprative stats, but Kansas looked lost and certainly did their rpi zero justice. They couldn’t hit FT’s, and turned the ball over in shocking fashion. No.1 team in the country, absolutely not.

By: schmittydidit

schmittydidit — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:40:57 +0000

Totally agree. Leave the ugly uniforms to nike

By: juliath83

juliath83 — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:54:41 +0000

Can we please end these “invisible” jerseys? The only time you should have difficulty seeing a player’s number is if he’s covered head to toe in mud.