Skip to content

Why’s Maryland freshman Roddy Peters wearing No. 2? Let Juan Dixon explain

Oct 10, 2013, 8:31 PM EDT

dixon Reuters

There’s no doubt that Juan Dixon is one of the greatest players in the history of Maryland basketball. The Baltimore native led the Terps to two Final Four appearances and their lone national title in 2002, doing so while wearing the number 3. But even with this being the case, there seems to be a debate regarding whether or not Terps who have followed Dixon should be allowed to wear the number.

Maryland freshman Roddy Peters was originally expected to wear Dixon’s number this season, with the former Terrapin initially giving his approval when asked by head coach Mark Turgeon. But Dixon had a change of heart after discussing the matter with friends and family, and as a result Peters will be wearing number 2 instead.

Dixon, who was “caught off guard” when contacted by Turgeon, discussed why he changed his mind in a story written by Don Markus of the Baltimore Sun:

“The more I thought about the more I talked about with my family and closest friends who were at my house at that particular time, I started having second thoughts and I called him back,” Dixon said in an interview with the Baltimore Sun on Thursday. “I said ‘Coach, that number is a lot bigger than Juan Dixon the individual. That number represents history. That represents the team, it represents so many more things. It’s sentimental to the University of Maryland and to the fans.’ That was my whole thought process in calling back and saying I had change of heart. I knew nothing about him wearing it or about him idolizing me or wearing for his mom and sisters.”

According to Dixon, former Maryland head coach Gary Williams had an “unwritten rule” that no player would wear the number because of the guard’s impact on the program. But the school, like more than a few college programs, chooses to merely honor great players as opposed to retiring their jersey number. The reason is simple: there’s a concern about the possibility of running out of numbers, with college rules prohibiting the use of any number that includes a 6, 7, 8 or 9.

Maryland’s had some great players, and as noted in Markus’ story numbers made famous by players such as John Lucas (15; Johnny Rhodes wore it in the mid-90s), Joe Smith (32; currently worn by Dez Wells) and others haven’t received the same treatment. Would Maryland be better served to retire the numbers of their most famous players (Dixon mentioned the No. 34 worn by Len Bias as another that shouldn’t be worn by future players)? Or should they continue on the current track of honoring the player but not retiring the number?

This will be an interesting situation to keep an eye on, with fans and former players likely having no shortage of opinions on the matter.

  1. hawkfather - Oct 10, 2013 at 8:57 PM

    Looking forward to seeing how the point guard position shakes out this year between Peters and combo guard Seth Allen.

  2. freerayray52 - Oct 10, 2013 at 10:00 PM

    I don’t understand the NCAA rule not allowing numbers above 5

  3. jrocknstuff - Oct 10, 2013 at 11:02 PM

    Exactly. I was just going to ask, what does that mean: no numbers above 5? Was that supposed to say 55? I mean, obviously players wear numbers in the high 30’s.

  4. voorheesma - Oct 11, 2013 at 12:16 AM

    Originally rule is so a ref can identify a player to the official scorers table using only 1 hand.
    34 & 3 should never be worn again in College Park.

  5. roarfrom384 - Oct 11, 2013 at 9:53 AM

    It does have to do with the officials signaling with their hands.

    You can have numbers higher than 5, you just can’t have a number with a 6,7,8, or 9 in it.

    Allowed: 33, 52, 24, 2, 14
    Not allowed: 56, 17, 81, 28, 9

    Seems silly. Never actually noticed it.

  6. annapterp - Oct 11, 2013 at 12:23 PM

    Love Juan Dixon, but no numbers are retired at Maryland. Juan was the main reason for the 2002 NC, but that was a long time ago. Other numbers in the rafters that are “honored” are still used, what makes #3 any different? Selfish act by Juan Dixon but not all that surprising. Get over yourself Juan.

  7. jthammerstix - Oct 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM

    Dixon wasn’t that good

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!