Former Nevada forward Cole Huff free to transfer to non-Mountain West schools in southern California
Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 PM EDT
When it was announced that forward Cole Huff would be leaving the Nevada program, what stuck out was the restrictions the school placed on Huff. Huff was prohibited from transferring to any Mountain West, Pac-12 or WCC institution, as well as any team on its 2014-15 non-conference schedule.
While the Mountain West stipulation wasn’t a shock, given the fact that many leagues have rules that make it difficult for (if not prohibit) a player who wishes to transfer within the conference, the fact that Huff was barred from joining any program in the Pac-12 or WCC was certainly an eye-opener.
According to Chris Murray of the Reno Journal-Gazette, Huff and the school have come to a compromise of sorts following an appeals meeting. Huff can now transfer to any Pac-12 or WCC school located in southern California, cutting down the number of prohibited schools to 38.
That opens the door for UCLA, USC, Loyola Marymount, Pepperdine and San Diego to throw their proverbial hat into the ring if they so choose.
“I met with Cole Huff today as part of the appeals process and it was a good dialogue,” Wolf Pack AD Doug Knuth said in a release. “We’ve agreed upon a list of schools, including all non-Mountain West institutions in Southern California, to which Cole can explore a transfer. We wish him the best.”
Typically, schools bar transferring players from going to another school within the conference. Nevada’s transfer restrictions were more severe, which led to some criticism, but have now been relaxed. Huff is still restricted from transferring to 38 schools, but can head to a school closer to home if he chooses.
Whether or not one truly believes the restrictions have been “relaxed” depends on their use of the word, but situations like these contribute to the frustration of some athletes with the current system. Huff’s on a one-year renewable scholarship, something that can be pulled at any point in time should a school decide to go that route (and the athlete wouldn’t have to get in trouble for that to happen, either).
The good news for Huff is that Thursday’s ruling puts some schools on the table that weren’t there before. But should he really be prohibited from going to any other school in the Pac-12 or WCC? It would be good to hear from the school their reasoning for both the original decision and why the other programs in those respective leagues remain off-limits.
- #FredHoibergWatch officially commences today, as Bulls fire Thibodeau 3
- There’s only one way the NCAA gets UNC investigation wrong: a 2016 postseason ban 37
- Academic issues expected to sideline St. John’s point guard for fall semester, maybe longer 7
- North Carolina announces receipt of Notice of Allegations from NCAA 3
- LSU’s ’25 is coming’ campaign doesn’t try to hide that they’re monetizing Ben Simmons 2
- Looking Forward: Catching up on the American’s offseason 1
- Five-star center Caleb Swanigan has committed to Purdue 8
- There’s only one way the NCAA gets UNC investigation wrong: a 2016 postseason ban (37)
- Four men’s teams banned from 2016 postseason due to APR scores (10)
- Academic issues expected to sideline St. John’s point guard for fall semester, maybe longer (7)
- Report: Class of 2016 four-star wing considering college among playing options for next season (5)
- Frank Kaminsky writes a farewell letter to Wisconsin fans (5)