May 8, 2014, 5:58 PM EDT
With the rapid increase in the amount of money that conferences receive from television networks, leagues and their members have been able to benefit in a number of ways. There’s the exposure that comes with those deals, and there’s also the increased revenue that leads to better salaries and facilities for many programs.
However, as Pac-12 basketball coaches have learned in recent years, there’s also a cost to be considered. The cost that had some coaches up in arms this past season had to do with scheduling, as the league moved further away from the traditional “Thursday-Saturday” setup that had been a staple of Pac-12 hoops in years past.
During the conference’s meetings in Phoenix earlier this week the topic was discussed, and according to Doug Haller of AZCentral.com coaches are hopeful that commissioner Larry Scott will make some changes. But will the conference move back to the “old school” way of doing things with its conference schedule?
While there may be some wiggle room, turning back the clock from a scheduling standpoint seems unlikely given Scott’s thoughts on the matter.
Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott said the conference’s television deals have brought in added revenue and exposure, but in doing so conference games have had to shift to different days.
“We’re not going to radically change our scheduling approach, but there is room for some tweaking here and there,” he said.
The 2013-14 season featured some peculiar weeks for teams within the Pac-12, with Arizona State’s final week of the regular season consisting of a game on a Tuesday night at Oregon (March 4), following by a game at Oregon State on Saturday (March 8). Other teams had to navigate a Wednesday-Sunday split, which presents the question of what to do in between games.
Do you fly back to campus, thus avoiding missing more class time than on a “usual” road trip? Or do you remain on the road, which would eliminate the possibility of players becoming too fatigued from flying back and forth? Should this be a question for programs? There are arguments on both sides, but ultimately in this era what the networks want tends to take precedence.
And given just how much is being paid to broadcast games, especially in the revenue sports, that’s unlikely to change anytime soon.
- 2014-15 Season Preview: Kentucky’s loaded rotation leads nation’s best front courts 0
- Cameron Payne didn’t expect to fill Isaiah Canaan’s void at Murray State, but he did 0
- 2014-15 Season Preview: The Top 20 Perimeter Attacks 1
- Top 25 Countdown: No. 12 Wichita State 1
- South Dakota State’s Cody Larson thrives despite return home amidst unmet expectations 2
- 2014-15 Season Preview: 20 Impact Freshmen 0
- UNC investigation states bogus classes pushed by academic counselors to athletes 7
- UNC investigation states bogus classes pushed by academic counselors to athletes (7)
- Report: Texas plans to start paying their athletes $10,000 stipend (4)
- 2014-2015 Season Preview: College Basketball’s Top 13 Dunkers (VIDEOS) (3)
- Maryland senior forward suffers sprained ankle (2)
- Texas A&M lands another five-star center, has loaded 2015 recruiting class (2)